Because Continuation

[mawes12]

Raymott already told you in post#8 that it's not a time marker.

I thought it could. Can I know why?

No, lying and sarcasm are quite different.

How is it different?

 

[MikeNewYork]

Can somebody please humanely euthanize this thread?

 

[MikeNewYork]

:up:

 

[mawes12]

Like I said before you don't have to reply if you don't know the answer. Y'all can't even answer the question without trying to stop the thread. :sleeping::sleeping: I'm starting to think some of you really think you know everything.

 

[Barb_D]

Enough. I don't support the use of profanity in this forum, but for the love of that is holy, how could ANYONE think that asking the exact same question over and over, and getting the exact same answer over and over, is a productive use of their time.

NO! "Because" is NOT a time marker. It can describe something happening before or during or later. You have been given MANY sentences showing this. Ask this same question again and you will be banned and you can find another forum to troll.

 

[Tdol]

The red part below was added by me, and I guess it is the implied meaning. Please tell me whether I have guessed correctly.

You have- I was being sarcastic.