hardyweineberg
Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2022
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Igbo
- Home Country
- Nigeria
- Current Location
- Nigeria
I wrote this essay and have questions about issues I have encountered several times.
The bar chart illustrates the outcome of a survey about the coffee and tea buying and drinking habits of people in five Australian cities.
Overall, in all the cities except Adelaide, people preferred going to the cafe for coffee or tea to buying them.
Regarding Melbourne, Hobart, Sydney, and Brisbane, around 63% of people in both Melbourne and Hobart visited a cafe to get coffee or tea, compared to just above 55% of Brisbane's residents. Furthermore, the percentage of people who purchased instant coffee in Hobart was about 54%, which was the largest and was much higher than Sydney's figure of just over 45%. When it came to fresh coffee, however, Sydney had the highest proportion of people who bought it, at roughly 43%, while Brisbane had the lowest, at below 35%.
Adelaide was the only place where the percentage of residents who bought instant coffee was greater than that of residents who visited a cafe for that purpose; 50% purchased instant coffee, and a slightly lower proportion (roughly 49%) went to a cafe. Lastly, under 35% bought fresh coffee.
"Adelaide was the only place where the percentage of residents who bought instant coffee was greater than that of residents who visited a cafe for that purpose; 50% purchased instant coffee, and a slightly lower proportion (roughly 49%) went to a cafe."
1) Is it grammatical and acceptable to omit "of its residents" and just say "50%"?
2) And is it okay to use "a slightly lower proportion" as the subject of the second sentence? I didn't want to be repetitive and write something like this: 50% of its residents purchased instant coffee, and roughly 49% went to a cafe.
3) Was my use of that semicolon grammatical and okay?
"Furthermore, the percentage of people who purchased instant coffee in Hobart was about 54%, which was the largest and was much higher than Sydney's figure of just over 45%."
4) Is it okay to say "Sydney's figure of"? If not, please explain why.
The bar chart illustrates the outcome of a survey about the coffee and tea buying and drinking habits of people in five Australian cities.
Overall, in all the cities except Adelaide, people preferred going to the cafe for coffee or tea to buying them.
Regarding Melbourne, Hobart, Sydney, and Brisbane, around 63% of people in both Melbourne and Hobart visited a cafe to get coffee or tea, compared to just above 55% of Brisbane's residents. Furthermore, the percentage of people who purchased instant coffee in Hobart was about 54%, which was the largest and was much higher than Sydney's figure of just over 45%. When it came to fresh coffee, however, Sydney had the highest proportion of people who bought it, at roughly 43%, while Brisbane had the lowest, at below 35%.
Adelaide was the only place where the percentage of residents who bought instant coffee was greater than that of residents who visited a cafe for that purpose; 50% purchased instant coffee, and a slightly lower proportion (roughly 49%) went to a cafe. Lastly, under 35% bought fresh coffee.
"Adelaide was the only place where the percentage of residents who bought instant coffee was greater than that of residents who visited a cafe for that purpose; 50% purchased instant coffee, and a slightly lower proportion (roughly 49%) went to a cafe."
1) Is it grammatical and acceptable to omit "of its residents" and just say "50%"?
2) And is it okay to use "a slightly lower proportion" as the subject of the second sentence? I didn't want to be repetitive and write something like this: 50% of its residents purchased instant coffee, and roughly 49% went to a cafe.
3) Was my use of that semicolon grammatical and okay?
"Furthermore, the percentage of people who purchased instant coffee in Hobart was about 54%, which was the largest and was much higher than Sydney's figure of just over 45%."
4) Is it okay to say "Sydney's figure of"? If not, please explain why.