Plain English

I can't help feeling that they've been a bit harsh on him; it is certainly is a bit clumsy, but the meaning is clear enough to me. Their choice of this particular gem from the Australian Taxations Office seems much more on the money:

For the purpose of making a declaration under this Subdivision, the Commissioner may:

a) treat a particular event that actually happened as not having happened; and
b) treat a particular event that did not actually happen as having happened and, if appropriate, treat the event as:

i) having happened at a particular time; and
ii) having involved particular action by a particular entity; and

c) treat a particular event that actually happened as:

i) having happened at a time different from the time it actually happened; or
ii) having involved particular action by a particular entity (whether or not the event actually involved any action by that entity).

I think the gist of this one is that they can do what they want when they want, and it would certainly take me a minute or two to work it out properly. However, they seem to have punished UK2Net for the wrong reasons:

YOUR EMAIL DID NOT REACH A HUMANOID. IT ONLY REACHED REPLICANT LEVEL 1. E-MAIL ARRIVING FROM HERE ARE SPOOLED FOR AUTOMATIC CHECKING AND WILL NOT BE READ BY HUMANOIDS.

I quite liked this email, but maybe they haven't seen Blade Runner. The reason I think the creator of this should be shot is for the unforgivable crime of writing in upper case.