Why it need to have been not needs to have been

Status
Not open for further replies.

ostap77

Key Member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Ukrainian
Home Country
Ukraine
Current Location
Ukraine
"Ladies and gentlemen, Barack Obama's commitment was reinforced -- not that it need to have been -- by his two relatively recent trips to Israel, when he met with Israeli leaders from across the spectrum -- and you all know it's a very wide spectrum in Israel...."

Why would it be "it need to have been...." not "it needs to have been......"?
 
"Ladies and gentlemen, Barack Obama's commitment was reinforced -- not that it need to have been -- by his two relatively recent trips to Israel, when he met with Israeli leaders from across the spectrum -- and you all know it's a very wide spectrum in Israel...."

Why would it be "it need to have been...." not "it needs to have been......"?

It's a mistake.
 
So there would need to be "it needed to have been..." or "it needs to have been"?
 
So there would need to be "it needed to have been..." or "it needs to have been"?

I would use "needs", although "needed" is possible.
 
Is this some sort of subjunctive? I would say it was if it said "and it need not be."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top