'which for us independent booksellers are unnameable'

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lemon

Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2020
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Korean
Home Country
South Korea
Current Location
South Korea
Hello, I hope you are having a lovely day!

source: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...cycling-bookseller-takes-on-the-online-giants

In the second paragraph, Santini says

“Quixote went to fight against the windmills,” Santini said of the protagonist in the classic novel by Miguel de Cervantes. “My windmills are the online retailers from those monster multinationals … which for us independent booksellers are unnameable.”

I think Santini would like to say 'Independent bookstores like him are unmaneable, compared with the online retailers from those monster multinationals' but I feel like he misused the relative pronoun 'which' in 'which for us independent booksellers are unnameable.'

1. Do you think I understood this paragraph correctly? or 'which for us independent booksellers are unnameable' is like 'which (for us independent booksellers) are unnameable' ?
2. Then I think the structure of 'which for us independent booksellers are unnameable.' is wrong. Then, how can I correct 'which for us independent booksellers are unnameable.' ?

Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
You have not understood Santini's words correctly. It is the online retailers which are unnameable for the independent booksellers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top