Today would have been the birthday of

Kontol

Member
Joined
Nov 22, 2021
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Javanese
Home Country
Indonesia
Current Location
Indonesia
I agree with you. However, I would say, "Today is Ron's birthday."
 
No. He's dead. After you're dead, you don't have birthdays.
 
There might be an AmE/BrE difference here. A British speaker says "Today would have been ...", whereas an American speaker says "Today is ..."
 
@Kontol I think you're right. People might say, "Today is Ron's birthday. If he were alive he'd be 88.
 
The OP didn't say that.
The phrase "would have been the birthday of ..." is what tells us he's dead. If he was alive, it would say "is the birthday of ...".
 
The phrase "would have been the birthday of ..." is what tells us he's dead. If he was alive, it would say "is the birthday of ...".
That's what I was thinking, but he doesn't look dead in that picture. I guess it's not current.
 
That's what I was thinking, but he doesn't look dead in that picture. I guess it's not current.
I can't work out if you're being serious.
 
I talked to my usage consultant. I said:

Do we say it's somebody's birthday even if they're deceased? For example, "Today is Martin's birthday. He would be 88 today."

She said she would say it like that.
 
I've read the posts in this thread with great interest and the comments of forum participants are very helpful.

However, I have a question. If a person were alive, we would celebrate his birthday today. I like the phrase 'Today is someone's birthday'. I wonder why we use 'would have been'. This construction is used when we are speaking about unreal situations in the past, but in this context we are speaking about the present day, so I would use 'would be someone's birthday'.

Please, explain.
 
Last edited:

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top