to be convinced by a proposition to the degree that there is evidence for it.

Status
Not open for further replies.

GoodTaste

Key Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
China
Current Location
China
I've failed to clearly understand the phrase "to be convinced by a proposition to the degree that there is evidence for it." It appears to possibly have two different meanings to me: (1) It means "to be convinced by a proposition, and the degree of this state of being convinced is that we believe that there is evidence for it"; (2) It means "to be convinced by a proposition, because the proposition has reached the degree that there is evidence for it."

Which one is correct?

===============
The doors leading out of scriptural literalism do not open from the inside. The moderation we see among nonfundamentalists is not some sign that faith itself has evolved; it is, rather the product of the many hammer blows of modernity that have exposed certain tenets of faith to doubt. Not the least among these developments has been the emergence of our tendency to value evidence and to be convinced by a proposition to the degree that there is evidence for it.


Source: The End of Faith by Sam Harris (PDF)
 
You may be more or less convinced by a given proposition. The more evidence for it, the more you'll be convinced. The degree of evidence will determine how convinced you'll be.
 
You may be more or less convinced by a given proposition. The more evidence for it, the more you'll be convinced. The degree of evidence will determine how convinced you'll be.

That is, the phrase "to be convinced by a proposition to the degree that there is evidence for it" means what you explain above (so neither (1) nor (2) is correct)?
 
That is, the phrase "to be convinced by a proposition to the degree that there is evidence for it" means what you explain above (so neither (1) nor (2) is correct)?
Correct. :) (I mean, the above statement is right, and both one and two are wrong.)
 
GoodTaste, your interpretation (1) may be only a little garbled. I suspect what you were trying to say is that the more evidence we perceive in support of a proposition, the more we tend to be convinced that the proposition is true. Is that what you were aiming at?
 
Basically, yes.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top