SOMETHING TO very badly gone with Western liberalism

[GoodTaste]

SOMETHING TO very badly gone with Western liberalism. Basically, classical liberalism believes that human progress is brought about by debate and reform. The best way to navigate disruptive change in a divided world is through a universal commitment to individual dignity, open markets, and limited government. Yet a resurgent China scoffs at liberalism for being selfish, decadent, and unstable. In our country, right-wing and left-wing populists attack liberalism for its elitism and its supposed privileges.

Source: The Economist
VT Computer

I don't understand the use of "to" - it seems to me that either "has" or "is" instead of "to" should be there: SOMETHING has very badly gone with Western liberalism. I am not very sure.

Is the use of "to" a typo there?

 

[5jj]

it seems to me that either "has" or "is" instead of "to" should be there: SOMETHING has very badly gone with Western liberalism. I am not very sure.

Is the use of "to" a typo there?

Yes (has).
Yes.

 

[Tdol]

And probably gone wrong.

 

[emsr2d2]

Out of curiosity, why did you say that the source was The Economist? I clicked on the link and the website is called VT Computer and there is no mention of the piece having been taken from The Economist originally.

 

[GoodTaste]

The poster should have mentioned it. It is picked up from The Economist I read somewhere. I remembered the question and, following the rule of our forum to offer the context and source, searched out it from VT Computer and posted it here. That is for convenience, of course.

 

[Tdol]

It looks like they're not too good at picking things up from The Economist, which generally has few mistakes.