[Grammar] "proves to be" vs "has proven to be"

Status
Not open for further replies.

englishteacher79

Junior Member
Joined
Nov 29, 2008
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
English
Home Country
Australia
Current Location
Australia
Can we say "This proves to be beneficial" (prove in the present simple) or do we need to say "This has proven to be beneficial"? I would guess that if something continues to prove to be beneficial, we can use "prove" in the present simple, but most of the time when we are talking about something proving to be beneficial, it's because the evidence/proof is in the past and thus "proven to be beneficial" is probably better.

What do you think?
 
I agree with you. The proof is in the past.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top