Possessive form of Barnes and the way it is pronounced

Status
Not open for further replies.

hanky

Key Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2008
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Vietnamese
Home Country
Vietnam
Current Location
Vietnam
Let's say Barnes is the name of a person. What is the possessive form of Barnes? Is this Barnes's or just Barnes' ? How do you pronounce it?

I am aware of the rules, but I don't know how to apply these rules to this specific case.

Thanks for your help.
H
 
I am aware of the rules, but I don't know how to apply these rules to this specific case.

For singular names ending in -s, the regular genitive is usual: Barnes's, but sometimes these nouns are treated as if they were plural nouns: Barnes'.
The latter form is frequent with archaic names.
 
For singular names ending in -s, the regular genitive is usual: Barnes's, but sometimes these nouns are treated as if they were plural nouns: Barnes'.
The latter form is frequent with archaic names.

I am aware of what you said and this is the reason why I asked the questions in the first post.
How would we treat this name of Barnes?
 
Let's say Barnes is the name of a person. What is the possessive form of Barnes? Is this Barnes's or just Barnes' ? How do you pronounce it?

I am aware of the rules, but I don't know how to apply these rules to this specific case.

Thanks for your help.
H
***NOT A TEACHER***Great question. Here in the United States, many people write: James' house. A few people and an occasional newspaper (such as The New York Times) will write: James's house. Regarding pronunciation, I'm not sure. I'm guessing that many (most?) pronounce it like: James house. Personally, I pronounce it the "correct" way: Jameses house. But one book said sometimes there are so many S sounds that you just can't pronounce all of them. The book's example was: Texas's capital. The book said you have three S sounds there. Thank you.
 
I am aware of what you said and this is the reason why I asked the questions in the first post.
How would we treat this name of Barnes?

1. Barnes' :tick:
2. Barnes's :tick:

2. is more frequent.

This is what I said and you were aware of. ;-)
 
***NOT A TEACHER***Great question. Here in the United States, many people write: James' house. A few people and an occasional newspaper (such as The New York Times) will write: James's house. Regarding pronunciation, I'm not sure. I'm guessing that many (most?) pronounce it like: James house. Personally, I pronounce it the "correct" way: Jameses house. But one book said sometimes there are so many S sounds that you just can't pronounce all of them. The book's example was: Texas's capital. The book said you have three S sounds there. Thank you.

So you go with Barnes', am I right?
Thanks.
 
I would use Barnes'
 
1. Barnes' :tick:
2. Barnes's :tick:

2. is more frequent.

This is what I said and you were aware of. ;-)

OK, now I got your opinion. Your two posts are not clearly equivalent to me. Thanks.
 
I would use Barnes'

Thank you, Bhai.
I think so, because "Barnses" (Barns's) is more difficult to pronounce than "Barns" (Barns').
 
Thank you, Bhai.
I think so, because "Barnses" (Barns's) is more difficult to pronounce than "Barns" (Barns').

Yes, I think if you say "Barnses" it sounds like you have a speech impediment.
 
Having grown up with friends named Barnes, we always said "The Barnses' house" as barn-zis.

If we wanted to talk about one of them, it was Jim Barnes's - said the same way.

I know it's a matter of style, but I always, always, use the 's form for people (or es' for plural) and add the "ziz" sound.
 
***NOT A TEACHER***Great question. Here in the United States, many people write: James' house. A few people and an occasional newspaper (such as The New York Times) will write: James's house. Regarding pronunciation, I'm not sure. I'm guessing that many (most?) pronounce it like: James house. Personally, I pronounce it the "correct" way: Jameses house. But one book said sometimes there are so many S sounds that you just can't pronounce all of them. The book's example was: Texas's capital. The book said you have three S sounds there. Thank you.
Stupendous answer to a wonderful question, I agree! Quite marvelous.
I'm in awe. Let me catch my breath before I go on.

[a little later]
I agree with your answer. That's how I write and pronounce it.
But I have one very small comment, and it's certainly not a criticism of your quite astounding answer.
The first two 's' sounds in Texas's are /s/ and the third is /z/, so this isn't really comparable to, say, Jesus's, which has three /z/ in a row, all of which, personally, I pronounce on the few occasions I need to say it.
Thanks for your post; immensely interesting!
 
Stupendous answer to a wonderful question, I agree! Quite marvelous.
I'm in awe. Let me catch my breath before I go on.

[a little later]
I agree with your answer. That's how I write and pronounce it.
But I have one very small comment, and it's certainly not a criticism of your quite astounding answer.
The first two 's' sounds in Texas's are /s/ and the third is /z/, so this isn't really comparable to, say, Jesus's, which has three /z/ in a row, all of which, personally, I pronounce on the few occasions I need to say it.
Thanks for your post; immensely interesting!
Thank you for your kind note. And thank you for the correction regarding " Texas's ." I am just an ordinary native speaker, so it was easier to say "S sound." Thanks to your reminder, I checked my books and realized that I should have used the word "sibilants." This website helps me to keep improving my native language thanks to teachers like you.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top