lo2
Member
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2008
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Danish
- Home Country
- Denmark
- Current Location
- Denmark
Hi there
I have got a bit confused with those three words that mean kind of the same, I know that one might have a stronger meaning to it (do you understand that?), but what else is the difference and do you just use them interchangeably?
And there there is this sentence that I wrote, but then afterwards I got in doubt (can you say that?) whether it was grammatically correct, here I am especially thinking congruence. Here is the sentence:
A country like Iran pops into mind, where last year (or two years ago?) there were protests, which were effectively put down, but now the protesters can see that it does help to demonstrate and that you can gain something from it, do you agree with me on that?
So should it be "was" or "were"? And why?
I have got a bit confused with those three words that mean kind of the same, I know that one might have a stronger meaning to it (do you understand that?), but what else is the difference and do you just use them interchangeably?
And there there is this sentence that I wrote, but then afterwards I got in doubt (can you say that?) whether it was grammatically correct, here I am especially thinking congruence. Here is the sentence:
A country like Iran pops into mind, where last year (or two years ago?) there were protests, which were effectively put down, but now the protesters can see that it does help to demonstrate and that you can gain something from it, do you agree with me on that?
So should it be "was" or "were"? And why?