On-time inoculation allows us to decrease the population’s morbidity 1.4-1.7 times

Status
Not open for further replies.

milan2003_07

Senior Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2011
Member Type
Academic
Native Language
Russian
Home Country
Russian Federation
Current Location
Russian Federation
Dear friends,

Below there is a sentence from my technical paper:

"On-time inoculation allows us to decrease the population’s morbidity 1.4-1.7 times or even more, reduce the death rate from influenza and influenza-associated death rate from somatic diseases".

I have a few questions about this sentence:

1) Is "on-time" coorect her? The intended meaning is inoculation given before the beginning (outbreak of the epidemics).

2) Do I need any preposition between "morbidity" and "1.4-1.7 times"? For example, "morbidity by 1.4-1.7 times".

3) Does "influenza-assocoiated" sound fine here?

Thanks
 
1. Yes.
2. No, not needed.
3. Yes.

Your original sentence would be better as two sentences.

"On-time inoculation allows us to decrease the population’s morbidity 1.4-1.7 times or even more. It also reduces the death rate from influenza and influenza-associated death rate from somatic diseases".
 
I am not a teacher.

Here's another opinion.

1. I'd prefer 'timely'.
2. Yes, use 'by'.
3. Yes.

The two-sentence version is better.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top