Tiziano
New member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2020
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- Italian
- Home Country
- Italy
- Current Location
- Italy
Hello everybody. I’m reading an interesting essay on famous crimes committed in Britain in the 19th century and in the chapter devoted to the notorious Jack the Ripper I stumbled upon a sentence where the use of the modal verb ‘might’ is not really clear - at least to me. Here’s the excerpt:
”The death of Martha Tabram aroused little interest, a common fate for these women (i.e. prostitutes), frequently alcoholic, all of them at the outer edges of poverty. At attack of particular ferocity might attract passing interest: four months earlier, Emma Smith had been gang-raped, including with a blunt instrument ‘with great force’, and then robbed. The level of violence (...) made her story worth a sentence or two to the newspapers”.
Is might used in the past or present sense? I think the meaning of the sentence is that Smith’s case maybe attracted some attention in the newspapers but only briefly but I’m not sure of this interpretation. Can anybody help me, please?
”The death of Martha Tabram aroused little interest, a common fate for these women (i.e. prostitutes), frequently alcoholic, all of them at the outer edges of poverty. At attack of particular ferocity might attract passing interest: four months earlier, Emma Smith had been gang-raped, including with a blunt instrument ‘with great force’, and then robbed. The level of violence (...) made her story worth a sentence or two to the newspapers”.
Is might used in the past or present sense? I think the meaning of the sentence is that Smith’s case maybe attracted some attention in the newspapers but only briefly but I’m not sure of this interpretation. Can anybody help me, please?
Last edited by a moderator: