Indeed nuanced points

Status
Not open for further replies.

Freeguy

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2013
Member Type
English Teacher
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran
After discussing my colleagues about the accuracy of these sentences, I reached an impasse. Would you please share your opinions with me?

1. He was driving fast indeed.
2. He was driving quite fast indeed.
3. It's cold. ~ It's indeed.

( ME: A. Wrong, B. Wrong, C. Right.)
( My colleagues:
1 = wrong.
2 = correct [but only in spoken English].
3 = partially correct ... It is my opinion that the second part of this really ought not to be abbreviated/contracted. It would more properly be written/spoken as "It IS indeed". This would give the statement emphasis. )
 
After discussing my colleagues about the accuracy of these sentences, I reached an impasse. Would you please share your opinions with me?

1. He was driving fast indeed.
2. He was driving quite fast indeed.
3. It's cold. ~ It's indeed.

( ME: A. Wrong, B. Wrong, C. Right.)
( My colleagues:
1 = wrong.
2 = correct [but only in spoken English].
3 = partially correct ... It is my opinion that the second part of this really ought not to be abbreviated/contracted. It would more properly be written/spoken as "It IS indeed". This would give the statement emphasis. )

3 is possible without the contraction. The other two are unnatural.
 
I want to know that why we use "very" in the first sentence but not in the second one.


1. He was driving very fast indeed.
2.
Mina's future looked promising indeed.

 
There's no reason why you can't use 'very' in #2 if you want to.

In fact, it sounds better with 'very' than without it.
 
You mean "Mina's future looked very promising indeed" would be better from "Mina's future looked promising indeed" ? I agree with you.
Michael Swan recommends not using indeed in this sense without very. However, this is Oxford's example that was used without very.
 
Last edited:
I gave you my idea in post #5.
 
Michael Swan recommends not using indeed in this sense without very. However, this is Oxford's example that was used without very.

I think the key word there is recommends. You don't have to follow a recommendation if you don't want to. Most will use very, but it's not compulsory.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top