I thought the picture was able to/could be taken as the source.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Perhaps this?
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/grammar/british-grammar/be-expressions-be-able-to-be-due-to

Past achievement: could or was/were able to?​

We usually use was/were able to, not could to talk about past achievements in affirmative clauses. This is because they are facts, rather than possibilities:
Only one person was able to beat the record.
Not: Only one person could beat the record.
We use couldn’t or, more formally, wasn’t/weren’t able to in negative clauses:
We weren’t able to finish the marathon in under four hours. (or We couldn’t finish the marathon …)
 
The reason I crossed out "seen" when you used it that way in your previous thread is that I thought you meant "I thought you could see the picture ... and it was the source".
I didn't take "I thought the picture could be seen as XXX" to mean "I thought the picture could be considered to be XXX".
 
Why is (a) not correct?
I don't think it's incorrect. It may not be the most obvious choice however, as there are less wordy options.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top