kttlt
Junior Member
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2023
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- Russian
- Home Country
- Russian Federation
- Current Location
- Russian Federation
The following text is from Stephen King's short story The Woman in the Room. The entire story is written in present simple which, I believe, is a stylistic choice; however, there's one sentence where that is not the case. I'm providing it within a larger portion of text for context, the sentence in question being the bolded one:
'I don't think she can really go on much longer,' he tells his brother later that night. His brother lives in Andover, seventy miles west. He only gets to the hospital once or twice a week.
'But is her pain better?' Kev asks.
'She says she itches.' He has the pills in his sweater pocket. His wife is safely asleep. He takes them out, stolen loot from his mother's empty house, where they all once lived with the grandparents. He turns the box over and over in his hand as he talked, like a rabbit's foot.
Why isn't "talked" in present simple here like the rest of the sentence/text? Is that sentence even grammatical? Is this also a stylistic choice and if so, what purpose does it serve?
'I don't think she can really go on much longer,' he tells his brother later that night. His brother lives in Andover, seventy miles west. He only gets to the hospital once or twice a week.
'But is her pain better?' Kev asks.
'She says she itches.' He has the pills in his sweater pocket. His wife is safely asleep. He takes them out, stolen loot from his mother's empty house, where they all once lived with the grandparents. He turns the box over and over in his hand as he talked, like a rabbit's foot.
Why isn't "talked" in present simple here like the rest of the sentence/text? Is that sentence even grammatical? Is this also a stylistic choice and if so, what purpose does it serve?