Had developed vs had been developing

Flogger

Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2016
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Iran
Current Location
Iran
Hello,

I’m wondering why the “had developed” part has not been changed into “ had been developing originally”. The reason I stress on this change is because of the structure of parallelism. What do you think?

The growth of commerce had brought Spaniards into contact with other societies that had developed original had been developing originally and stimulating literary traditions.

I copied it from a GMAT exam.
 
I can't see where the parallelism is.

You incorrectly changed the adjective 'original' into an adverb.
 
What reason could you possibly have for using the present perfect continuous instead of the present perfect simple?
 
What reason could you possibly have for using the present perfect continuous instead of the present perfect simple?

I thought that “stimulating” was a verb and since it was preceded by “and” then any verbs coming before “and” must adopt an “ing”. That’s why I changed it to the progressive tense. Now I see the problem.
 
Do you understand the sentence?
 
That's what's important. Focus on understanding what you read.
 

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top