zeyadsama
Member
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2013
- Member Type
- Interested in Language
- Native Language
- Arabic
- Home Country
- Egypt
- Current Location
- Egypt
Some people think that it is acceptable to request any amount of money to fulfill a crucial need and to pay a low salary for subordinates, while others think that it is morally wrong to apply that in our lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Exploitation has different aspects in many fields, but it can be defined as treating someone unfairly to benefit from their work or making use of a situation to gain unfair advantage for oneself. Although those exploiters do not do anything wrong or unethical from their point of view, personally, I disagree with them.
On the one hand, in terms of academia life, getting a high education should be prized by demanding any amount of fees for their services. For example,an university professor, who teaches a specific major, receives more fees than the assistant teacher. Moreover, they justify
Similarly, salaries for blue-collar workers are less than the white-collar because the former usually do not have high degree qualifications. Thus, it is fair to be paid less than the others even if it is not enough to fulfill their basic needs for well-being life.
On the other hand, for a variety of reasons, it is unprofessional to utilize the need of people by changing one's standards according to the situations or to give low wages for people who unskilled in mentally work. Some exploiters from instructors, for instance, request more money because they see the more urgent you are or have a limited time, the more money they can earn regardless of their constant effort with the other students. It means, they may teach the same curriculum for others with lower fees. Therefore, we should not accept that in all majors to limit their personal financial gains and to teach them that ethics come before the knowledge, since it is not a matter of money.
In conclusion, the more we strive to exclude greedy business owners and academic professors from exploiting our lives, the more we can benefit from our time and learn from better resources.
Exploitation has different aspects in many fields, but it can be defined as treating someone unfairly to benefit from their work or making use of a situation to gain unfair advantage for oneself. Although those exploiters do not do anything wrong or unethical from their point of view, personally, I disagree with them.
On the one hand, in terms of academia life, getting a high education should be prized by demanding any amount of fees for their services. For example,an university professor, who teaches a specific major, receives more fees than the assistant teacher. Moreover, they justify
Similarly, salaries for blue-collar workers are less than the white-collar because the former usually do not have high degree qualifications. Thus, it is fair to be paid less than the others even if it is not enough to fulfill their basic needs for well-being life.
On the other hand, for a variety of reasons, it is unprofessional to utilize the need of people by changing one's standards according to the situations or to give low wages for people who unskilled in mentally work. Some exploiters from instructors, for instance, request more money because they see the more urgent you are or have a limited time, the more money they can earn regardless of their constant effort with the other students. It means, they may teach the same curriculum for others with lower fees. Therefore, we should not accept that in all majors to limit their personal financial gains and to teach them that ethics come before the knowledge, since it is not a matter of money.
In conclusion, the more we strive to exclude greedy business owners and academic professors from exploiting our lives, the more we can benefit from our time and learn from better resources.
Last edited:
