Well, that's exactly what I thought, until I saw in one of the dictionaries the version with "of" and now I'm puzzled...
;-)
Well... Though I am too young to remember the communism times in Poland too well, but I wouldn't be that sure: this may be true. Communism systems are so illogical that anyone who has not encountered them may have problems with believing them, not to mention understanding.Here is another description of the usage battle, much more entertaining than the American Heritage one. I'm pretty sure the bit about Communist countries is meant as a joke.
Expresso Tilt: Great Comprise Debate
I guess that dictionary has come down on one side of the argument (described in other posts). On one side, a lot of people use 'comprised of' [wash my mouth out with soap and water], and on the other side a lot of people disapprove. ;-)
b
I take it that you're neutral on this issue, Bob. :-D
Please see the earlier discussion in this forum:The following meanings are very clearly defined, are extracted (copied) from the Oxford dictionary, and are also my understanding of the usage of the word:
"comprise
• verb
1 be made up of; consist of.
2 (also be comprised of) make up; constitute.
— USAGE Traditionally, comprise means ‘consist of’ and should not be used to mean ‘constitute or make up (a whole)’. However, a passive use of comprise is becoming part of standard English: this use (as in the country is comprised of twenty states) is more or less synonymous with the traditional active sense (as in the country comprises twenty states).
— ORIGIN from French, ‘comprised’, from comprendre ‘comprehend’."
If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know: