Allen165
Key Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2009
- Member Type
- Student or Learner
- Native Language
- English
- Home Country
- Canada
- Current Location
- Switzerland
One may put a comma before "and" to set off an independent clause, which comprises a subject and verb. So the comma before "and" in the following sentence is correct:
He spent the day studying, and she went on a trip.
But it was my understanding that "and" could also be preceded by a comma when the subject is understood, for example:
He played the piano in the morning, and washed his car in the afternoon.
In "and washed his car in the afternoon" the subject is "he" and is understood; in other words, one does not have to repeat it. However, yesterday I read an article (see Comma chameleon: How it changes the color of your meaning | Article | Homepage articles) that suggests that the comme before "and" is wrong. This was quite upsetting, since I've been using a comma in sentenes such as the one above for some time now. But I was sure that I had seen other writers do it as well, so I went to look for some examples and found the following:
On those other nights, though, the coach could sit him down, and let more productive players take over.
The Bobcats have spent much of the season with the NBA's best defense, and are likely to make the playoffs.
“So he's surrounded by better players, and playing at a very high level.”
Despite the setback, however, Milwaukee remains in solid position to nab a surprise playoff berth, and could find itself seeded as high as fifth.
The above sentences were written by an ESPN blogger, and I'm assuming they're grammatically correct - but I don't understand why the use of the comma before "and" is correct. Could you explain why?
Thank you very much.
He spent the day studying, and she went on a trip.
But it was my understanding that "and" could also be preceded by a comma when the subject is understood, for example:
He played the piano in the morning, and washed his car in the afternoon.
In "and washed his car in the afternoon" the subject is "he" and is understood; in other words, one does not have to repeat it. However, yesterday I read an article (see Comma chameleon: How it changes the color of your meaning | Article | Homepage articles) that suggests that the comme before "and" is wrong. This was quite upsetting, since I've been using a comma in sentenes such as the one above for some time now. But I was sure that I had seen other writers do it as well, so I went to look for some examples and found the following:
The six-year, $111 million contract he signed in 2008 is one of the biggest in NBA history, and extends through the 2013-2014 season.
On those other nights, though, the coach could sit him down, and let more productive players take over.
The Bobcats have spent much of the season with the NBA's best defense, and are likely to make the playoffs.
“So he's surrounded by better players, and playing at a very high level.”
Despite the setback, however, Milwaukee remains in solid position to nab a surprise playoff berth, and could find itself seeded as high as fifth.
The above sentences were written by an ESPN blogger, and I'm assuming they're grammatically correct - but I don't understand why the use of the comma before "and" is correct. Could you explain why?
Thank you very much.
Last edited: