clothes (which) she felt like wearing and was comfortable in

[diamondcutter]

My mother makes her own clothes. She has never seen the value of passing trends, and instead has always created clothes she felt like wearing and was comfortable in.
[url]https://pulptastic.com/10-things-my-cool-mom-taught-me/[/URL]

I think a relative pronoun 'which' is omitted after the word ‘clothes’. I don’t think it can be omitted because it functions as the subject of the second relative clause: which was comfortable in.

What do you say?

 

[GoesStation]

No. Both that and which are possible in American English, but neither is required. The sentence flows better as it's written.

 

[jutfrank]

You've got the grammar wrong. The word clothes isn't the subject of anything, it's the object of wearing and also the object of in.

 

[tzfujimino]

"... clothes she felt like wearing and (she) was comfortable in. …"

 

[tedmc]

"... clothes she felt like wearing and (she) was comfortable in. …"

With the "she" in front, I think it could be omitted.

 

[tzfujimino]

I was merely trying to point out that the pronoun was omitted.