[Grammar] Certain continuous verbs (live, study) in the present perfect + a since phrase

Status
Not open for further replies.

donnach

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Member Type
Other
Native Language
English
Home Country
United States
Current Location
United States
This is confusing:

I have lived in NYC since 2001.

This could mean that since 2001, I moved to NYC and then out of NYC. But it could also mean that I began living in NYC in 2001 and continue to live there.

According to my grammar book, there are certain continuous verbs that can be used in the present perfect OR present perfect progressive to express a situation that began in the past and continues to the present. Live is one of those verbs.

How do the ESL teachers on this message board instruct their students in this situation?

Thanks for the help!
 
This is confusing:

I have lived in NYC since 2001.

This could mean that since 2001, I moved to NYC and then out of NYC. But it could also mean that I began living in NYC in 2001 and continue to live there.

According to my grammar book, there are certain continuous verbs that can be used in the present perfect OR present perfect progressive to express a situation that began in the past and continues to the present. Live is one of those verbs.

How do the ESL teachers on this message board instruct their students in this situation?

Thanks for the help!

"I have lived in NYC since 2001" and "Since 2001, I have lived in NYC" both mean "I moved to NYC and I still live there."

If you want to say that during the time period beginning in 2001 and ending now, you moved to NYC and then moved somewhere else, you need to name both places:

I have lived in NYC and London since 2001.
Since 2001, I have lived in NYC, London, Amsterdam and Johannesburg.
 
According to my grammar book, there are certain continuous verbs that can be used in the present perfect OR present perfect progressive to express a situation that began in the past and continues to the present. Live is one of those verbs.
The progressive form implies limited duration. One of the things that suggested to my colleagues that I had (subconsciously) decided that Prague had become my permanent home was when I stopped saying "I have been living in Prague for x years" and started saying "I have lived in Prague for x years".

As the idea of permanence may not be uppermost in the speaker's mind at the moment of speaking, the choice of form may sometimes seem fairly random. When I first arrived in Prague, and thought that would I stay for only ten months, I almost certainly used only the progressive form, and, of course 'x months' rather than 'x years'. Today, fourteen years later, I use almost exclusively the non-progressive form. If I do use the progressive form sometimes, it may be that, as I am English, have a mother and daughter in England whom I visit regularly, and lived in England for nearly half a century, part of me still thinks of my residence here as being of limited duration.

I have spoken of my residence in Prague to show that, with certain verbs, especially those, like 'live', which in themselves contain the idea of some length of the situation denoted, there may well be no automatically natural form.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top