...all/what he found was/were...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tan Elaine

Key Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2008
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
English
Home Country
Hong Kong
Current Location
Hong Kong
1. To his dismay, all he found was/were a few oysters with no pearls in them.

2. To his dismay, what he found was/were a few oysters with no pearls in them.

Does 'all' and 'what' affect the choice of the verb? I think 'were' should be used in the first sentence, while 'was' is the correct verb for the second sentence. Am I correct?

Thanks.
 
1. To his dismay, all he found was/were a few oysters with no pearls in them.

2. To his dismay, what he found was/were a few oysters with no pearls in them.

Does 'all' and 'what' affect the choice of the verb? I think 'were' should be used in the first sentence, while 'was' is the correct verb for the second sentence. Am I correct?

Thanks.

Yes, I would agree with that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top