A wolf is not a dangerous animal vs The wolf is not a dangerous animal.

Status
Not open for further replies.

sadra1400

Junior Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2022
Member Type
Student or Learner
Native Language
Persian
Home Country
Tajikistan
Current Location
UK
A wolf is not a dangerous animal vs The wolf is not a dangerous animal.

Are these two sentences the same?
Are their meanings the same?
 
Last edited:
1. A wolf is not a dangerous animal. vs
2. The wolf is not a dangerous animal.

Are these two sentences the same?
Are their meanings the same?
No, of course they're not the same. They contain different words.
Yes, their meanings are effectively the same.
 
They're dangerous to other animals.

Wolves primarily eat meat. Their favourite prey is large ungulates (hoofed mammals) such as deer, elk, moose, caribou, and bison. Since many of these animals are larger than wolves, the only way wolves can catch them is to live and hunt in groups.
(Wikipedia)
 
I think you should probably say this instead:

Wolves are not dangerous animals.
 
Mind you, if a pack came towards me, I wouldn't be thinking how glad I am not to be an ungulate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ask a Teacher

If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know:

(Requires Registration)
Back
Top