I don't really understand what you are getting at by your question/s.
A toy was lying on the table.
A toy was placed on the table.
Both these sentences are grammatically correct. They have different meanings. How natural they are depends on the contexts in which they are uttered.
Without more context, it could also mean Somebody placed a toy on the table.
It would if there was any context. (There isn't.)
If you're simply describing a room (or its contents), you need only "There's/There was a toy on the table".
Do you want to make a big thing of the toy being on the table?Ok, but that sounds a little bland.
Ok, but that sounds a little bland. How about, 'A teddy bear was neatly placed on the table'?
The problem with "was placed" is that it can suggest that someone was doing the placing at the time of looking. To make it clear that the teddy bear was already there, use "had been placed". I don't like the use of "neatly" for just one item. How would you put a teddy bear on a table messily?!
Interesting. May I ask something similar about another sentence?
He was sitting on the pier. His basket was [STRIKE]placed[/STRIKE] next to him.
Should I reword this too?
What was in the basket? Lunch?
Does it matter?
Does it matter?
Ron: What are you doing?
Rob: Fishing.
Ron: What's in the basket?
Rob: Nothing.
Ron: Nothing? Why don't you have anything in the basket?
Rob: It's for the fish.
Ron: It's for the fish?
Rob: That's right. Any fish I catch will be going in the basket.
Ron: OK. Good luck!
Rob: Oh! Oh! Oh! I got a bite!
Ron: All right!
If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know: