No, especially now when many American forests are tragically bursting into flame.
I wouldn't.That is really tragic. It really aches my heart.
But, generally, can't I use "burst with" with wildlife or animals?
You could say "teeming with wildlife" though.
It doesn't work. The current forest fires just make it a worse choice than it already was.Yes I already knew that one. But I wanted to see if "burst" can also be used. I don't know if burst is wrong or if it should be avoided because of the tragic fires that are devouring forests in the U.S.:-(
If you have a question about the English language and would like to ask one of our many English teachers and language experts, please click the button below to let us know: